AMD Radeon HD 7790 versus ATI Radeon HD 5870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7790 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7790
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 85 Watt versus 188 Watt
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 4800 MHz
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 versus 2199
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 versus 416
- 8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 versus 1858
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 versus 18.789
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 versus 1.775
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 versus 43.496
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 versus 4541
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 versus 4541
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 versus 23 September 2009 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt versus 188 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 4800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 versus 2199 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 versus 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 versus 1858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 versus 18.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 versus 1.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 versus 43.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 versus 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 versus 4541 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5870
- Environ 21% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 68.0 GTexel / s versus 56 GTexel / s
- Environ 79% de pipelines plus haut: 1600 versus 896
- Environ 52% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,720.0 gflops versus 1,792 gflops
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 versus 828.247
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 versus 217.744
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3671 versus 988
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 2061
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3671 versus 988
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 2061
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.0 GTexel / s versus 56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1600 versus 896 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,720.0 gflops versus 1,792 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 versus 828.247 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 versus 217.744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3671 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 2061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7790
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | 2199 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 | 1858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 | 18.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 | 1339.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 | 1.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 | 43.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 | 245.813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 | 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 988 | 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2061 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 | 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 988 | 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2061 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7790 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Bonaire | Cypress |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2013 | 23 September 2009 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 820 | 770 |
Prix maintenant | $134.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.57 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1600 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 188 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,154 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 183 mm | 282 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |