AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 versus 14.911
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 versus 533.677
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 versus 1.681
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 versus 31.229
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 versus 66.187
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 930 versus 475
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1631 versus 657
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 930 versus 475
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1631 versus 657
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 November 2013 versus 28 June 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 versus 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 versus 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 versus 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 versus 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 versus 66.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 versus 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 versus 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 versus 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 versus 657 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- Environ 44% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 575 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 32.2 billion / sec versus 3.2 GTexel / s
- 2.6x plus de pipelines: 336 versus 128
- 7.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 772.8 gflops versus 102.4 gflops
- 6.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1877 versus 271
- 4.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 versus 77
- 4.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 versus 1203
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 billion / sec versus 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 336 versus 128 |
Performance á point flottant | 772.8 gflops versus 102.4 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 versus 271 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 versus 77 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 versus 1203 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 271 | 1877 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1203 | 5696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | 66.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 | 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Kalindi | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 23 November 2013 | 28 June 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1351 | 1353 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 575 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 102.4 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 336 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 3.2 GTexel / s | 32.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,178 million | 1,950 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 336 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 1536 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |