AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM versus AMD Radeon HD 7730M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7730M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 730 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 780 MHz versus 675 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 943 versus 775
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 279 versus 214
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 versus 69.757
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 8 January 2013 versus 24 April 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz versus 575 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz versus 675 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 943 versus 775 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 versus 214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 versus 69.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7730M
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 21.6 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 15% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 691.2 gflops versus 599.0 gflops
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6787 versus 5970
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.244 versus 14.771
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.172 versus 285.896
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.524 versus 1.219
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.319 versus 24.949
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1777 versus 1759
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3220 versus 2540
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1777 versus 1759
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3220 versus 2540
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.6 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops versus 599.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6787 versus 5970 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.244 versus 14.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.172 versus 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.524 versus 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.319 versus 24.949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1777 versus 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3220 versus 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1777 versus 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3220 versus 2540 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7730M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7730M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 943 | 775 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 | 214 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5970 | 6787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 | 15.244 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 | 289.172 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 | 1.524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 | 25.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 | 69.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 | 1777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 | 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 | 1777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 | 3220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7730M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Oland | Chelsea |
Date de sortie | 8 January 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1153 | 1154 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz | 675 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 575 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 25 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |