NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M versus AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 730 MHz
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 967 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 65% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.94 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 742.7 gflops versus 599.0 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1332 versus 943
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 versus 14.771
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 versus 1759
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 versus 2540
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 versus 1759
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 versus 2540
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 730 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz versus 780 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops versus 599.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1332 versus 943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 versus 14.771 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 versus 1759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 versus 2540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 versus 1759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 versus 2540 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 281 versus 244
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5970 versus 4261
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.896 versus 251.09
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.219 versus 1.144
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.949 versus 10.872
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 versus 13.423
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3334
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3334
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 281 versus 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5970 versus 4261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 versus 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 versus 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 versus 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 versus 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3334 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1332 | 943 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 281 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4261 | 5970 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | 14.771 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | 285.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | 1.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | 24.949 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | 72.899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | 1759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 | 2540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | 1759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 | 2540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Oland |
| Date de sortie | 9 January 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1155 | 1156 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
