AMD Radeon Pro 460 versus AMD Radeon HD 6990
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 460 and AMD Radeon HD 6990 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 460
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 830 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 10.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 375 Watt
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 versus 3013
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 versus 630
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.089 versus 17.264
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.46 versus 1.76
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.755 versus 53.903
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4664 versus 4562
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4664 versus 4562
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 versus 8 March 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 830 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 versus 3013 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 versus 630 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 versus 17.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.46 versus 1.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 versus 53.903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4664 versus 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4664 versus 4562 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6990
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 58.05 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 1024
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,549.8 gflops versus 1,858 gflops
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 840.452 versus 594.914
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 versus 226.93
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 1842
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 1842
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,549.8 gflops versus 1,858 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 840.452 versus 594.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 versus 226.93 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 460
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | AMD Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 | 3013 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 | 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15271 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 | 17.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 594.914 | 840.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.46 | 1.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 | 53.903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 | 265.302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4664 | 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4664 | 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 460 | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Nom de code | Baffin | Antilles |
| Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 | 8 March 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 629 | 626 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 907 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 830 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,858 gflops | 2x 2,549.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.05 GTexel / s | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,640 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 295 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 460 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
ATIRadeon X550
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
ATIFireGL V5600
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
NVIDIATesla M10
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
