Revue de la carte vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro 460 carte vidéo sortie par AMD; release date: 30 October 2016. La carte video est conçue pour les ordinateurs mobile workstation et est basé sur la microarchitecture GCN 4.0 nom de code Baffin.
Vitesse du noyau - 850 MHz. Vitesse augmenté - 907 MHz. Taux de remplissage de la texture - 58.05 GTexel / s. Pipelines - 1024. Performance de point flottant - 1,858 gflops. Technologie de fabrication - 14 nm . Compte de transistors - 3,000 million. Utilisation d’énergie (TDP) - 35 Watt.
Type de mémoire: GDDR5. Amonte maximale de RAM - 4 GB. Largeur du bus mémoire - 128 Bit. Vitesse du mémoire - 5080 MHz. Bande passant du mémoire - 81.28 GB / s. Mémoire partagé - 0.
Référence
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Nom | Valeur |
|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15309 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection | 44.089 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation | 594.914 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex | 3.460 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition | 55.755 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining | 226.930 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 4664 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 1842 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3346 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 4664.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 1842.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3346.000 Fps |
Performance des jeux
1. Resident Evil 7 (2017)
2. Dishonored 2 (2016)
3. Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)
4. Titanfall 2 (2016)
5. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
6. Battlefield 1 (2016)
7. Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
8. Overwatch (2016)
2. Dishonored 2 (2016)
3. Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)
4. Titanfall 2 (2016)
5. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
6. Battlefield 1 (2016)
7. Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
8. Overwatch (2016)
9. Doom (2016)
10. The Division (2016)
11. Far Cry Primal (2016)
12. XCOM 2 (2016)
13. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
14. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
15. Anno 2205 (2015)
16. The Witcher 3 (2015)
17. Sims 4 (2014)
10. The Division (2016)
11. Far Cry Primal (2016)
12. XCOM 2 (2016)
13. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
14. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
15. Anno 2205 (2015)
16. The Witcher 3 (2015)
17. Sims 4 (2014)
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 157.80 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 47.10 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 21.70 |
Dishonored 2 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 61.40 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 26.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 22.90 |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 85.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 46.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 40.60 |
Titanfall 2 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 115.60 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 35.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 32.00 |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 235.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 92.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 34.70 |
Battlefield 1 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 132.60 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 40.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 35.40 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 66.60 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 12.20 |
Overwatch (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 201.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 106.70 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 48.80 |
Doom (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 65.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 30.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 29.70 |
The Division (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 102.80 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 28.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 22.30 |
Far Cry Primal (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 74.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 35.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 32.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 21.00 |
XCOM 2 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 88.70 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 31.90 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 21.70 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 9.90 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
| Low, 1024x768 | 76.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.80 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 20.80 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 150.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 55.20 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 45.00 |
Anno 2205 (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 120.90 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 8.80 |
The Witcher 3 (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 83.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 28.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 17.40 |
Sims 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024x768 | 164.90 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 69.60 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 63.00 |
Caractéristiques
Essentiel |
|
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Baffin |
| Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 635 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
|
| Vitesse augmenté | 907 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,858 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
|
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |
Soutien API |
|
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
|
| RAM maximale | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 |
Technologies |
|
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | |
| FreeSync | |
| HDMI 2.0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 460 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
ATIRadeon X550
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270DX
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
NVIDIATesla M10
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
NVIDIAT600 Mobile
