AMD Radeon Pro 5500M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 124.8 GTexel/s versus 136.7 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 41% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 85 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 8008 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36509 versus 33576
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 versus 1373.562
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 versus 8.694
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 versus 21.766
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 versus 454.799
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 Nov 2019 versus 19 July 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel/s versus 136.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1280 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 8008 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36509 versus 33576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 versus 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 versus 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 versus 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 versus 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10080 versus 6832
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 versus 673
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 105.82
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 9175
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 3670
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 9175
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 3670
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4202 versus 3426
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10080 versus 6832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 versus 673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 105.82 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 3670 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4202 versus 3426 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6832 | 10080 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36509 | 33576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 | 4202 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | GP106 |
Date de sortie | 13 Nov 2019 | 19 July 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 365 | 338 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 24 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel/s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 4,400 million |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Longeur | 250 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |