AMD Radeon Pro 555X versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 555X and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12516 versus 4984
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 versus 12.449
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 versus 455.796
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 versus 1.295
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 versus 24.566
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 versus 28.025
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 versus 3093
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 versus 3093
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 versus 25 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12516 versus 4984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 versus 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 versus 455.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 versus 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 versus 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 versus 28.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 versus 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 versus 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3344 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 907 MHz
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 5100 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 versus 2350
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 versus 2350
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 907 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 5100 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 versus 2350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 versus 2350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12516 | 4984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 455.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 28.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 3504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 3504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3344 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1687 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 | 25 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 980 | 982 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 1,270 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.36 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 555X avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 555X vs
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO
AMDRadeon Pro 555X vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770M
AMDRadeon Pro 555X vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000
AMDRadeon Pro 555X vs
NVIDIATesla K10
AMDRadeon Pro 555X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
AMDRadeon Pro 555X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M275
