AMD Radeon Pro 575 versus AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 575
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 140.8 GTexel / s versus 137.5 GTexel / s
- 919.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,506 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6800 MHz versus 6600 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34778 versus 33729
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 versus 511.362
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2814 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 1674
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2814 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 1674
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 versus 4 August 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 926 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.8 GTexel / s versus 137.5 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,506 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz versus 6600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34778 versus 33729 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 versus 511.362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 1674 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 86.154
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 1090.128
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 versus 7.88
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 versus 98.349
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 9613
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 9613
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 86.154 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 1090.128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 versus 7.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 versus 98.349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 9613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 9613 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34778 | 33729 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | 111.543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | 1817.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | 9.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | 99.875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | 511.362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1674 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 4 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 485 | 486 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,506 gflops | 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.8 GTexel / s | 137.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 217.6 GB / s | 211 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz | 6600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 575 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
ATIFireGL V3350
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7650 GS
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q
AMDRadeon Pro 575 vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop)
