AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon Pro 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon Pro 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1105 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 112.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 74.958
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1070.209
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 6.94
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 89.457
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 436.958
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 7664
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3463 versus 2340
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 7664
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3463 versus 2340
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 5 June 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1105 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 112.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 74.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1070.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 6.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 89.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 436.958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 versus 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 versus 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1408
- Environ 4% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 3.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6800 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 570
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 74.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1070.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 6.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 89.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 436.958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30283 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | Polaris 20 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 5 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 421 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1105 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 112.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,584 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 217.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 6800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
