AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1340 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 48% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 116.142
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1022.932
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 9.235
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 84.034
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 607.721
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 11281
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 11281
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1340 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 57% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s
- Environ 64% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1408
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 3463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 3463
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1408 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3349 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8856 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39678 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4362 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 340 | 339 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 185 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Single-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |