AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 1140 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1335 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1919.95
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 94.964
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 492.867
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 23 April 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 1140 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1335 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 492.867 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Environ 4% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.2 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s
- Environ 9% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1408
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 130.7
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 versus 13.641
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3463
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 versus 13.641 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 195.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 333 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | 128.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.202 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 64.08 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
