AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 84% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 230 Watt
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 13 August 2018 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1530 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 171.616 versus 130.7
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 versus 2361.73
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.925 versus 13.641
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 versus 135.462
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 versus 774.974
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 versus 12184
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 versus 3463
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 versus 3355
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 versus 12184
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 versus 3463
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 versus 3355
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1530 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 versus 130.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 versus 2361.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 versus 13.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 versus 135.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 versus 774.974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 versus 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 versus 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 versus 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 versus 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 247.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 30936 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 118 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $999 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 12,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 2000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |