AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 98% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 2046.214
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 94.532
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 645.647
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 10140
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 10140
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 27 May 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 2046.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 94.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 645.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 175.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s
- Environ 64% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1408
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 versus 130.7
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 versus 13.641
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 versus 3463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 versus 13.641 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 220.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 2046.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 16.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 94.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 645.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8279 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 340 | 337 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | 175.0 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 11.20 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | 5.599 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 77.76 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 10800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Single-slot | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850 X2
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
