AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 409.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 300 Watt
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 27 June 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1382 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1600 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 1408
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 versus 130.7
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 versus 2361.73
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.789 versus 13.641
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 135.462
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 774.974
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12980 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12980 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 versus 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 versus 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 190.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 3611.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 17.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 181.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1373.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75705 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 198 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1382 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
