AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 235 Watt
- Environ 22% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1430 MHz
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 1 October 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 235 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1430 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1304 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1442 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 3584 versus 1408
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.937 versus 130.7
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 versus 2361.73
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.191 versus 13.641
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 144.928 versus 135.462
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1056.078 versus 774.974
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16640 versus 12184
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 3463
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 3355
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16640 versus 12184
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 3463
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 3355
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1304 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1442 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 versus 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.191 versus 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 versus 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1056.078 versus 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16640 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16640 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 355.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 4858.771 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 25.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 144.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1056.078 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 16640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 13211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 22133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 16640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 13211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 22133 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16374 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 84757 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | GP100 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 1 October 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 88 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1442 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1304 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 15,300 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 10,329 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1430 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
