AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1408 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 71.86
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 832.248
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 4.039
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 65.117
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 245.081
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 6796
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 6796
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 7 February 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 versus 512 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 71.86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 4.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 65.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 245.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3348 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 versus 3463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 71.86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 4.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 65.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 245.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3348 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | GP107 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $375 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 324 | 517 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $319.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 3,300 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 145 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIFireGL V7600
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDFireStream 9170
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
