AMD Radeon R2 Graphics versus NVIDIA GRID K340
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA GRID K340 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 15x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 225 Watt
Date de sortie | 27 February 2015 versus 23 July 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K340
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 950 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 5.6 GTexel / s
- 12x plus de pipelines: 4x 384 versus 128
- 16.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4x 729.6 gflops versus 179.2 gflops
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.822 versus 2.751
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 411.582 versus 93.854
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.116 versus 0.263
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.441 versus 6.299
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.699 versus 16.121
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 5.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 384 versus 128 |
Performance á point flottant | 4x 729.6 gflops versus 179.2 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.822 versus 2.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 411.582 versus 93.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.116 versus 0.263 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.441 versus 6.299 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.699 versus 16.121 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA GRID K340 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.751 | 10.822 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 | 411.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.263 | 1.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.299 | 21.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 | 36.699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA GRID K340 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Beema | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 27 February 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1592 | 1594 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 950 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 179.2 gflops | 4x 729.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 4x 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.6 GTexel / s | 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 930 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 4x 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 4x 28.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4x 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz |