AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 23.499
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 27 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 64 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 versus 23.499 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 5.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 12.13 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 256
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 388.1 gflops
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 versus 2981
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 versus 6.331
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 119.568
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 0.543
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 versus 12.649
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 966
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1363
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 1915
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 966
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1363
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 1915
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 12.13 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 256 |
| Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 388.1 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 versus 2981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 versus 6.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 119.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 versus 0.543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 versus 12.649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 1915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 1915 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 3332 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Wani | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 27 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1551 | 1003 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300 GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600M GS
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics vs
IntelUHD Graphics 605
