AMD Radeon R5 M230 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M230 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 versus 22.557
- 23.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 985 versus 42
- 35x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 versus 55
- 33.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 versus 72.2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 versus 22.557 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 versus 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 versus 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 versus 72.2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926 MHz versus 825 MHz
- Environ 73% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.63 GTexel / s versus 17.1 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 30% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 711.2 gflops versus 547.2 gflops
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5016 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 versus 8.593
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 versus 143.386
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 versus 0.852
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 versus 15.789
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 versus 985
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 versus 1927
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 versus 2401
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s versus 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops versus 547.2 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 versus 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 versus 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 versus 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 versus 15.789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 versus 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 versus 2401 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 417 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 | 10.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 | 370.814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 | 1.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 | 20.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 | 22.557 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 | 2483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | 3406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 | 4045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 | 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 | 72.2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Jet | GK107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1445 | 1446 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 5 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops | 711.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s | 29.63 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16 GB/s | 80.26 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 5016 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 M230 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 450
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400E
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820M
