NVIDIA GeForce 820M versus AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD Radeon R5 M230 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1802 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 490 versus 417
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.305 versus 143.386
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 versus 985
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 2401
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 versus 985
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 2401
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 versus 7 January 2014 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 490 versus 417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 versus 143.386 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 2401 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 825 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 71% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.1 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 320 versus 96
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 547.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 versus 114
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 versus 2789
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.593 versus 7.765
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.852 versus 0.686
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 versus 14.257
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 versus 22.768
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 versus 1447
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 versus 1447
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 versus 114 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 versus 2789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 versus 7.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 versus 0.686 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 versus 14.257 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 versus 22.768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 versus 1447 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 versus 1447 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 490 | 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 114 | 128 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 | 4596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 2401 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 820M | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Jet |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 | 7 January 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1444 | 1445 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 16 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 820M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 450
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 435M
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
