AMD Radeon R7 350 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 667 MHz
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 3008 MHz
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7729 versus 4563
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.508 versus 12.383
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 versus 358.892
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 versus 1.107
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 versus 21.761
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 versus 40.703
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 667 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 768.4 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 3008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7729 versus 4563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 versus 12.383 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 versus 358.892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 versus 1.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 versus 21.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 versus 40.703 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 32.02 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 512
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 versus 2072
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 3122
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 versus 2072
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 3122
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.02 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 576 versus 512 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 versus 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 versus 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7729 | 4563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | 12.383 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 358.892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | 1.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 21.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 40.703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 2294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 3605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 2294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 3605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3362 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1360 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1114 | 1117 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $84.95 | |
| Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 576 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 32.02 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 48.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 3008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 350 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ti
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9700 PRO
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDRadeon 520
