AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM versus AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 380 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 190 Watt
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 970 MHz
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 190 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 970 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 108.6 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 1792 versus 512
- 3.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,476 gflops versus 947.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6081 versus 1901
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 versus 530
- 7.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 versus 9694
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.135 versus 24.788
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1503.633 versus 638.196
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7635 versus 2809
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3666
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7635 versus 2809
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3666
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.6 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,476 gflops versus 947.2 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6081 versus 1901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 versus 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 versus 9694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 versus 24.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 versus 638.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 versus 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 versus 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 6081 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 653 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | 76397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 58.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 1503.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | Antigua |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 764 | 370 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Prix maintenant | $264.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 3,476 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 108.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 5,000 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
| Longeur | 221 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 182.4 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3450
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
