AMD Radeon R7 M265 versus NVIDIA GeForce 710A
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M265 and NVIDIA GeForce 710A pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M265
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 719 MHz
- Environ 72% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 19.8 GTexel / s versus 11.5 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 633.6 gflops versus 276.1 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 546 versus 472
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 versus 2638
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.031 versus 7.071
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 versus 141.919
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 versus 0.636
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 versus 13.803
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 68.392 versus 23.162
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 versus 1112
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 versus 1112
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 May 2014 versus 17 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 719 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.8 GTexel / s versus 11.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 633.6 gflops versus 276.1 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 versus 472 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 versus 2638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 versus 7.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 versus 141.919 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 versus 0.636 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 versus 13.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 versus 23.162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 versus 1112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 versus 1112 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 710A
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 versus 138
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1967 versus 1264
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1967 versus 1264
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 versus 138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1967 versus 1264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1967 versus 1264 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | NVIDIA GeForce 710A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 | 472 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 | 193 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 | 2638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 | 7.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 | 141.919 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | 0.636 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 | 13.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 | 23.162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 | 1112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 | 1967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 | 1112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 | 1967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 M265 | NVIDIA GeForce 710A | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Topaz | GK208 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Date de sortie | 20 May 2014 | 17 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1396 | 1397 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 825 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 719 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 633.6 gflops | 276.1 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.8 GTexel / s | 11.5 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 32 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |