AMD Radeon R7 M340 versus ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M340 and ATI Radeon HD 5670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M340
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 943 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1021 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.16 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 7.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5185 versus 693
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.48 versus 3.914
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.943 versus 0.319
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.063 versus 12.627
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.38 versus 27.325
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1550 versus 1462
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1732 versus 1129
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1550 versus 1462
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1732 versus 1129
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 14 January 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 943 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1021 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.16 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5185 versus 693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.48 versus 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.943 versus 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.063 versus 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.38 versus 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1550 versus 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1732 versus 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1550 versus 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1732 versus 1129 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 400 versus 320
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 620.0 gflops versus 549.1 gflops
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 versus 651
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 versus 152
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 184.557 versus 164.511
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2113 versus 1668
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2113 versus 1668
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 400 versus 320 |
Performance á point flottant | 620.0 gflops versus 549.1 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 versus 651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 versus 152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 versus 164.511 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 versus 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M340
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M340 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 651 | 801 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 291 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5185 | 693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.48 | 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 164.511 | 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.943 | 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.063 | 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.38 | 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1550 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1732 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1550 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1732 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 | 2113 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 M340 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Meso | Redwood |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 14 January 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1383 | 1427 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1021 MHz | 775 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 943 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 549.1 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.16 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 627 million |
Stream Processors | 400 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Eyefinity | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |