AMD Radeon R7 M460 versus NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M460 and NVIDIA GeForce 940M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M460
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 1072 MHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 206 versus 154
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.673 versus 168.449
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.572 versus 1.307
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.024 versus 21.837
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 versus 2132
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 versus 2132
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2016 versus 13 March 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 1072 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 versus 154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 versus 168.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.572 versus 1.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 versus 21.837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 versus 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 versus 2132 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.22 GTexel / s versus 27 GTexel / s
- Environ 5% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 864.0 gflops
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1126 versus 1073
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5925 versus 4999
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 19.679
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 85.168
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 1767
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2772
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 1767
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2772
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s versus 27 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 864.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1126 versus 1073 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5925 versus 4999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 19.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 85.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2772 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M460
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 | 1126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 | 5925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.679 | 25.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 | 168.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.572 | 1.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 | 21.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.168 | 101.399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 | 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2772 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 | 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2772 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 M460 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Meso | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1224 | 1227 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1125 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 864.0 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,870 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |