AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce 710M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 710M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
Date de sortie | 17 February 2014 versus 24 July 2013 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 719 MHz versus 554 MHz
- 6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 90 Watt
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 versus 877
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 versus 877
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 versus 1131
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 versus 1131
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 2817
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 2817
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz versus 554 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 90 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 versus 877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 versus 877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 2817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 2817 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 710M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 877 | 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 877 | 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1131 | 3075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1131 | 3075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2817 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2817 | 3325 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Spectre | GK208 |
Date de sortie | 17 February 2014 | 24 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1398 | 1399 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 554 MHz | 719 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 585 million |
Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |