NVIDIA GeForce 910M versus AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 910M and AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 910M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 554 MHz
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 90 Watt
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 versus 877
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 versus 1131
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3020 versus 2817
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 versus 877
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 versus 1131
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3020 versus 2817
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 17 February 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 554 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 90 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 versus 877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3020 versus 2817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 versus 877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3020 versus 2817 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 910M | AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 588 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 | 877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3020 | 2817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 | 877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3020 | 2817 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 910M | AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF117 | Spectre |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 17 February 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1382 | 1385 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 554 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 90 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 2,410 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |