AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics versus NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2817 versus 2297
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2817 versus 2297
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 February 2014 versus 1 June 2012 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2817 versus 2297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2817 versus 2297 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
- Environ 53% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 554 MHz
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 90 Watt
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 versus 877
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 versus 877
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 versus 1131
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 versus 1131
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 554 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 90 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 versus 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 versus 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1695 versus 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1695 versus 1131 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 877 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 877 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1131 | 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1131 | 1695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2817 | 2297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2817 | 2297 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 780 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.636 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 115.549 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.024 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.485 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Spectre | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 17 February 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1398 | 1401 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.90 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.90 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 6.18 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 554 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,270 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 326.4 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 192 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1000M
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
