AMD Radeon R9 280X versus NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 280X and NVIDIA Tesla K20m pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,096 gflops versus 3,524 gflops
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6209 versus 4432
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 685 versus 210
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.187 versus 54.89
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 versus 1414.755
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.656 versus 5.303
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 versus 83.807
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 versus 250.291
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 versus 8319
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 versus 8319
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 October 2013 versus 5 January 2013 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops versus 3,524 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6209 versus 4432 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 685 versus 210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 versus 54.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 versus 1414.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 versus 5.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 versus 83.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 versus 250.291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 versus 8319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 versus 8319 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 146.8 GTexel / s versus 128.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 22% de pipelines plus haut: 2496 versus 2048
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 67% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 5 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 versus 3700
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 versus 3357
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 versus 3700
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 versus 3357
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 146.8 GTexel / s versus 128.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2496 versus 2048 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 5 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 versus 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 versus 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 280X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 280X | NVIDIA Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6209 | 4432 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 685 | 210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | 54.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | 1414.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | 5.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | 83.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | 250.291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 | 8319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | 7337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 10873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 | 8319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | 7337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 10873 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2347 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14510 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 280X | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Tahiti | GK110 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 8 October 2013 | 5 January 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | $3,199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 378 | 408 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2496 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.0 GTexel / s | 146.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | 7,080 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 275 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 5 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288 GB/s | 208.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 280X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
ATIRadeon X1800 GTO²
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GX2
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 XT
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 PRO
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
IntelArc A370M
