AMD Radeon R9 380 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 138.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 versus 34898
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1503.633 versus 1348.307
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3335
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3335
- 5.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2791 versus 475
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 19 September 2014 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 versus 34898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 versus 1348.307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 versus 475 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1216 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 144 billion / sec versus 108.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1792
- Environ 43% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,981 gflops versus 3,476 gflops
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 165 Watt versus 190 Watt
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11115 versus 6085
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 versus 653
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 110.006 versus 58.135
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9566 versus 7635
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9566 versus 7635
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1216 MHz versus 970 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 144 billion / sec versus 108.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1792 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,981 gflops versus 3,476 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt versus 190 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11115 versus 6085 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 versus 653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 versus 58.135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 versus 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 versus 7635 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6085 | 11115 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 | 34898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | 1348.307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 | 475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Antigua | GM204 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 19 September 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $549 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 375 | 378 |
Prix maintenant | $264.99 | $605.06 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 31.71 | 21.18 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | 1216 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 28 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,476 gflops | 4,981 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.6 GTexel / s | 144 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 165 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pins |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 182.4 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |