AMD Radeon R9 380 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1664
- 138.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 versus 28516
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1503.633 versus 1225.96
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3698
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3340
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3698
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3340
- 7.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2791 versus 362
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 19 September 2014 |
Pipelines | 1792 versus 1664 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 versus 28516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 versus 1225.96 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 versus 362 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,920 gflops versus 3,476 gflops
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 148 Watt versus 190 Watt
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9635 versus 6098
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 653
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 versus 58.135
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 7635
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 7635
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 970 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109 billion / sec versus 108.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops versus 3,476 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt versus 190 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9635 versus 6098 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 versus 58.135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 7635 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6098 | 9635 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 | 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 | 28516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | 1225.96 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 | 362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.76 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Antigua | GM204 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 19 September 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $329 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 375 | 378 |
Prix maintenant | $264.99 | $407.76 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 31.71 | 28.59 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 28 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,476 gflops | 3,920 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1664 |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.6 GTexel / s | 109 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 148 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pins |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 182.4 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |