AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition versus AMD Radeon E8860
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and AMD Radeon E8860 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 800 MHz versus 625 MHz
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 32 GTexel / s versus 25 GTexel / s
- Environ 28% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,024 gflops versus 800.0 gflops
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.151 versus 20.395
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 versus 1.683
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 versus 15.803
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 versus 47.86
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 versus 1246
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1667 versus 1655
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 versus 1246
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1667 versus 1655
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 25 January 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 575 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz versus 625 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32 GTexel / s versus 25 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,024 gflops versus 800.0 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 versus 20.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 versus 1.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 versus 15.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 versus 47.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 versus 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 versus 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 versus 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 versus 1655 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E8860
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 versus 1557
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 versus 353
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 versus 9638
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 529.248 versus 516.994
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 versus 3326
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 versus 3326
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1686 versus 1557 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 versus 353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26300 versus 9638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 529.248 versus 516.994 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4345 versus 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4345 versus 3326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8860
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | AMD Radeon E8860 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 | 1686 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 436 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9638 | 26300 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | 20.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | 529.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | 1.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | 15.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | 47.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | 4345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 | 4345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | AMD Radeon E8860 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Tropo | Venus |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 25 January 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1029 | 1030 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 625 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 575 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,024 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,500 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 37 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |