AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20286 versus 8654
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 29.528
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 731.755
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 2.486
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 42.15
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 87.659
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 4133
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3331
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 4133
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3331
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 versus 8654 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 versus 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 versus 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 versus 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 1232
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 1232
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 1232 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 | 8654 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3331 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | GK106 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 856 | 860 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
| Genre | Laptop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 960 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M390 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon R9 M390 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
