AMD Radeon RX 480 versus NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 480 and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 861 MHz
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1266 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 182.3 GTexel / s versus 132.9 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6612 MHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 versus 659
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39256 versus 29514
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 99.169
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 versus 53.364
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 versus 498.551
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3677
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3324
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3677
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3324
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 versus 29 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz versus 861 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s versus 132.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 2048 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6612 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 versus 659 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39256 versus 29514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 versus 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 versus 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 versus 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3324 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- 733.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,252 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9369 versus 8613
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1183.119 versus 769.541
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.899 versus 7.593
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12524 versus 11172
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12524 versus 11172
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,252 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9369 versus 8613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1183.119 versus 769.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.899 versus 7.593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 versus 11172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 versus 11172 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 480 | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8613 | 9369 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 | 659 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39256 | 29514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4165 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 480 | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | GM204 |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 | 29 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $2,856.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 354 | 351 |
Prix maintenant | $299.99 | $1,498 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | 7.47 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz | 861 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | 4,252 gflops |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | n / a | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |