AMD Radeon RX 550 versus AMD Radeon R7 350
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon R7 350 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 38% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 48% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 37.86 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 56% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 4500 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 7787
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 25.508
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 647.813
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 2.72
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 44.6
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 109.558
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 2072
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 2072
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 6 July 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 4500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 7787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 25.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 647.813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 2.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 44.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 109.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 2072 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- 682.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2158
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2158
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 versus 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 versus 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2158 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon R7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 7787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 25.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 647.813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 2.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 44.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 109.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon R7 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Lexa | Cape Verde |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 6 July 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 1083 |
| Prix maintenant | $75 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 819.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 168 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 550 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 X2
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX150
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX 550 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile
