AMD Radeon RX 550 versus AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 37.86 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 56% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 4500 MHz
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 1901
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 9694
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 24.788
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 638.196
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 2.619
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 41.414
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 112.347
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 2809
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 2809
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 30 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 925 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 4500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 1901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 9694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 24.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 638.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 2.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 41.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 112.347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 2809 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- 789.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 947.2 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 versus 476
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2158
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2158
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 versus 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2158 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 1901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 9694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 24.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 638.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 2.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 41.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 112.347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Lexa | Cape Verde |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 764 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 925 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 947.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |