AMD Radeon RX 550 versus Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and Intel HD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1183 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 37.86 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s
- 21.3x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 24
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 1114
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 268
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 4554
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 27.948
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 312.246
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 1.795
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 20.404
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 32.567
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 1859
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 1859
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 30 August 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 1114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 4554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 1859 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- 368x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 versus 940
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 2158
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 versus 940
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 2158
- 3.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 versus 127
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 versus 127 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 1114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 4554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Lexa | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 1216 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 441.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |