AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 72% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1845 MHz versus 1075 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 162.4 GTexel/s versus 176 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 92% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 44541 versus 42988
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2024.814 versus 1722.98
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 versus 11.661
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 versus 37.16
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11075 versus 10471
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 versus 3695
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 versus 3338
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11075 versus 10471
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 versus 3695
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 versus 3338
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 versus 2 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz versus 1075 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s versus 176 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44541 versus 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 versus 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 versus 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 versus 37.16 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 versus 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 versus 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 versus 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 versus 3338 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 1408
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13805 versus 9134
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 versus 776
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 128.135
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 versus 742.778
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5754 versus 4910
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2816 versus 1408 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13805 versus 9134 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 versus 776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 versus 128.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 versus 742.778 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5754 versus 4910 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9134 | 13805 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 853 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44541 | 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4910 | 5754 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | GM200 |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 | 2 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $649 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 304 | 306 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $679.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 22 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 8,000 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2816 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,060 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |