AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon R9 390 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 85% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1845 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 162.4 GTexel/s versus 160.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 14x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9134 versus 8910
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 44565 versus 43803
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 128.135 versus 120.267
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 versus 11.097
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 versus 116.473
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 742.778 versus 607.381
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11075 versus 10445
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11075 versus 10445
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4910 versus 3949
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s versus 160.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9134 versus 8910 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44565 versus 43803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 versus 120.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 versus 11.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 versus 116.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 versus 607.381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 versus 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 versus 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 versus 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 versus 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 versus 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4910 versus 3949 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390
- Environ 82% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1408
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 versus 776
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 versus 2024.814
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1408 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 versus 776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 versus 2024.814 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9134 | 8910 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44565 | 43803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 120.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 3164.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 11.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | 116.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 607.381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4910 | 3949 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | Grenada |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $329 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 304 | 307 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 22 | 40 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 6,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,120 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | 275 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 512 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |