AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon R9 290X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 95% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1845 MHz versus 947 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 162.4 GTexel/s versus 176.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 92% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 11.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9134 versus 8611
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 versus 765
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 44541 versus 43456
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 128.135 versus 117.322
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 versus 11.12
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 versus 120.942
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 742.778 versus 628.757
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11075 versus 8729
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11075 versus 8729
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4910 versus 3925
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 versus 24 October 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz versus 947 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s versus 176.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9134 versus 8611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 versus 765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44541 versus 43456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 versus 117.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 versus 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 versus 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 versus 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 versus 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 versus 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 versus 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4910 versus 3925 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 290X
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 1408
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 versus 2024.814
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 versus 3722
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 versus 3722
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2816 versus 1408 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 versus 2024.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 versus 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 versus 3722 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9134 | 8611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44541 | 43456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 117.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4910 | 3925 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | Hawaii |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 | 24 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $549 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 304 | 302 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz | 947 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 22 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s | 176.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 6,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,632 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | 275 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 512 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |