AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 881 versus 791
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 13 August 2018 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 881 versus 791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1130 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 versus 13688
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 versus 64852
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 207.909
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 3560.776
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 20.486
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 versus 148.938
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 1111.648
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 13621
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 13621
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 versus 7710
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1130 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 versus 13688 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 versus 64852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 207.909 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 3560.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 20.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 versus 148.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 1111.648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 13621 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 versus 7710 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13688 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 881 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64852 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7710 | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $6,299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 192 | 112 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |