AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 224.6 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 4 November 2017 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 1130 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2304
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- 7.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 versus 64601
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 296.223 versus 207.909
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3560.776
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 20.486
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 148.938
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1111.648
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 13621
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 13621
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2345 versus 1670
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 1130 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 2304 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 versus 64601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 versus 207.909 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3560.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 20.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 148.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1111.648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 13621 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2345 versus 1670 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13513 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 870 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64601 | 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 296.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 4303.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 23.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 163.551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1382.954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1670 | 2345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 4 November 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $1,199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 214 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 11408 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |