AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1130 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 224.6 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 versus 136.223
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 versus 1011.233
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 13 November 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 versus 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 versus 1011.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3714 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85799 versus 64821
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 207.909
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 3560.776
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 20.486
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 13621
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 13621
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 versus 7702
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85799 versus 64821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 207.909 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 3560.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 20.486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 13621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 13621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 versus 7702 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13597 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 874 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64821 | 85799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 232.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 3728.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 24.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1011.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7702 | 7856 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 13 November 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $899 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 205 | 207 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon 780M
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
