AMD Radeon RX 570 versus AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 570 and AMD Radeon R9 280X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 128.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 versus 6211
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 89.187
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 7.656
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 versus 493.57
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3862 versus 2346
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 8 October 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 128.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 versus 6211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 versus 493.57 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3862 versus 2346 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- 803.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,096 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 686 versus 626
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 versus 1083.926
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 versus 79.029
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 versus 9172
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 versus 3624
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 versus 9172
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 versus 3624
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 686 versus 626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 versus 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 versus 79.029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 570 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 6211 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 686 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3862 | 2346 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 570 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Tahiti |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 8 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 396 | 378 |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | 4,096 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 275 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DDMA audio | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio |