AMD Radeon RX 570 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 94.1 billion / sec
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1152
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 versus 4803
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 versus 532
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 versus 14261
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 37.505
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 versus 864.402
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 3.09
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 versus 40.457
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 versus 84.186
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 versus 6927
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 versus 6927
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 25 June 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 94.1 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1152 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 versus 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 versus 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 versus 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 versus 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 versus 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 versus 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 versus 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 versus 6927 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- 466.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,378 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3624
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3624
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 versus 880
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 versus 880 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 1659 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 25 June 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $249 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 405 | 576 |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $249.99 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | 23.69 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | 2,378 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1152 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 39.81 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
