AMD Radeon RX 570 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1536
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 versus 5939
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 versus 562
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 versus 18068
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 49.824
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 4.899
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 versus 44.06
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 versus 103.884
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 versus 7412
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 versus 7412
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1536 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 versus 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 versus 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 versus 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- 653.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 1083.926
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 3624
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 3624
- 2.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 versus 880
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 1083.926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3624 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 versus 880 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 2155 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 30 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 405 | 515 |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $449.99 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | 15.45 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | 3,333 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | 134 billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 570 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 570 vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 570 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 XT
AMDRadeon RX 570 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 PRO
AMDRadeon RX 570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
AMDRadeon RX 570 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 570 vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
