AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1247 MHz
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- Environ 31% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 295 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16357 versus 14121
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 versus 791
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 195.478
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 versus 2129.009
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 versus 14.889
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 129.271
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2134 versus 1669
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 7 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1247 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 versus 14121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 versus 791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 129.271 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 versus 1669 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 77476
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 versus 14699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 | 14121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77476 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 | 1669 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 162 | 186 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | 64 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | 26.7 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | 13.4 TFLOPs |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | 98.90 GP/s |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Stream Processors | 2560 | 4096 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | 395.80 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 160 | 256 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | 750 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 279 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |