AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1312 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16661 versus 16235
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 406
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 73.167
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1253.829
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 21 June 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1312 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16661 versus 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 73.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1253.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3360 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 438.4 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 180318 versus 77155
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 252.601
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 3949.565
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 versus 24.769
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 versus 14699
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 versus 14699
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180318 versus 77155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 252.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 3949.565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 versus 24.769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 versus 14699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16661 | 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77155 | 180318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 500.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 7209.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 41.826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 73.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1253.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Volta |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 21 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 135 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1312 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | None |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon 760M
