AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 58% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 930 MHz
- Environ 52% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 248.4 GT/s versus 163.7 GTexel / s
- 4.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 750 Watt
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14351 versus 7748
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 878 versus 796
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66189 versus 43046
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 106.585
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 1878.403
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 9.751
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 82.208
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 versus 511.115
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 versus 9143
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 versus 9143
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 26 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 930 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s versus 163.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 750 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14351 versus 7748 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 878 versus 796 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66189 versus 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 versus 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 versus 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 versus 9143 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3723
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 versus 3366
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3723
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 versus 3366
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 versus 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 versus 3366 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14351 | 7748 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 878 | 796 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66189 | 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 32085 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1866 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Hawaii |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 26 March 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 202 | 200 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 930 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 750 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 6,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,238 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |